 |
|
|
|
Year 2015 - Volume 35, Number 7
|
|
Evaluation of methods of the otoscopy and parasitological swab in diagnosis of canine otocariosis: a bayes analysis, 35(7):659-663
|
ABSTRACT.- Neves R.C.S.M., Mateus L.A.F., Lima S.R., Cruz F.A.C.S., Rosa J.G., Ferraz R.H.S., Mendonça A.J. & Barros L.A. 2015. [Evaluation of methods of the otoscopy and parasitological swab in diagnosis of canine otocariosis: a bayes analysis.] Avaliação dos métodos de otoscopia e exame do swab parasitológico no diagnóstico da otocariose canina: uma abordagem bayesiana. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 35(7):659-663. Hospital Veterinário, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Av. Fernando Corrêa da Costa 2367, Bairro Boa Esperança, Cuiabá, MT 78068-900, Brazil. E-mail: nevesrita@hotmail.com.br
Mites of the genus Otodectes are parasites found frequently in the ear of dogs and cats, being recognized as the main causers of external otitis in these animals. Three hundred and twenty dogs, deriving of the city of Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, had been examined through the otoscopy and of the examination of parasitological swab, with the objective to evaluate through the bayes’analysis for the estimate of the prevalence, sensitivity and especificity of these methods in the diagnosis of the infestation caused for the mite, using dates informative and not informative a priori. Each animal was considered an experimental unit. Of the total of examined dogs, 142 (44.37%) had been presented positive for otocariosis. In 100 animals (31.25%) the infestation was diagnosed by the two methods, in 31 (9.69%) only for the examination of parasitological swab, in 11 (3.44%) only for the otoscopy and in 178 (55.62%) animal the result was negative for both the methods. The sensitivity of the otoscopy, when compared with the examination of parasitological swab, was considered lesser, however the especificity of tests they do not differ. The informative model with priori it demonstrated to be most reasonable and considerably reduced the interval of credibility of the estimates of the parameters. It can be concluded that Bayes’analysis is effective in the estimation of prevalence and characteristics of the diagnostic tests. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
