 |
|
|
|
Year 2013 - Volume 33, Number 7
|
|
Computerized electrocardiography in dogs: a comparative study, 33(7):949-953
|
ABSTRACT.- Oliveira L.S., Santos R.R.B., Melo M.B., Laranjeira D.F. & Barrouin-Melo S.M. 2013. [Computerized electrocardiography in dogs: a comparative study.] Eletrocardiografia computadorizada em cães: estudo comparativo. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 33(7):949-953. Departamento de Anatomia, Patologia e Clínicas, Escola de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Av. Adhemar de Barros 500, Salvador, BA 40170-110, Brazil. E-mail: barrouin@ufba.br
Computerized electrocardiography (C-EKG) has been more frequently used in Veterinary Medicine. Many equipment models are available for this purpose. Due to possible device sensitivity and reproducibility differences during examination, the main goal of this study was to compare electrocardiographic parameters of dogs using two different C-EKG systems: Wincardio Micromed® (WIN) and TEB ECGPC® (TEB). Forty two healthy male and female dogs of different breeds (Cocker Spaniel, Dachshund, Labrador, Pinscher, Pitbull Terrier, Poodle, Schnauzer, Shih Tzu, Yorkshire and mongrel dogs), with age between 4 months and 16 years old were grouped according to weight and evaluated by both systems. The electrocardiographic measurements were performed on DII lead for both systems. The study showed that the TEB system was more sensitive for measurement of P wave and QRS complex duration, while the WIN system showed more sensitivity for the measurements of amplitude of the same parameters. The larger animals (26-37kg) showed greater variance in the measurements of P wave and QRS complex amplitude and duration than the groups of medium (14-25kg) or smaller (3-13kg) dogs. These differences must be considered when using diverse computerized electrocardiography systems to perform measurements due to the possibility of erratic interpretation of the results between veterinary medicine services. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
