 |
|
|
|
Year 2002 - Volume 22, Number 1
|
|
lmmunofluorescence using Brazilian isolates for serological diagnosis of lentivirus infection in goats, 22(1):7-12
|
ABSTRACT-. Reischak D., Ravazzolo A.P. & Moojen V. 2002. [lmmunofluorescence using Brazilian isolates for serological diagnosis of lentivirus infection in goats.] Imunofluorescência utilizando isolados brasileiros no diagnóstico soro lógico de infecção por lentivírus em caprinos. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 22(1):7-12. Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 9090, Porto Alegre, RS 91540-000, Brazil. E-mail: dilchak@hotmail.com
Small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLV) are distributed worldwide and cause persistente infections in sheep and goats. The purpose of this work was to develop an indirect immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) test using Brazilian SRLV isolates for serological diagnosis of infection in goats. The IFA test was compared in its sensitivity and specificity to the AGID test in which Maedi-Visna WLC-1 strain was used as antigen. Ovine synovial secondary cell cultures infected with two goat SRLV isolates (CAEV UFRGS/Br-2 and CAEV UFRGS/Br-5) were used for the IFA. Goat serum samples (n = 239) were tested by the two tests. The AGID test detected antibodies in 129 (53.9%) serum samples. A higher number of animals was considered positive for the IFA. However, different results were obtained depending on the isolate used for the antigen preparation. When CAEV UFRGS/Br-2 was used as antigen, 216 (90.3%) sérum samples tested positive, against 213 (89.1%) with CAEV UFRGS/Br-5. There was no significant statistical difference between the antigens prepared with these two isolates. The IFA had sensitivity of 94.6% and 96.9%, and specificity of 14.5 % and 20%, when CAEV UFRGS/Br-2 and CAEV UFRGS/Br-5 were used as antigens, respectively. These results demonstrate that the IFA with antigens prepared with Brazilian SRLV isolates may play an important a role as a complementary serological test for the diagnosis of infections by these agents. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
